Volume 6 Issue 1
Feb.  2021
Article Contents
Turn off MathJax

Citation:

Wood Plastic Composites Based Wood Wall's Structure and Thermal Insulation Performance

  • Corresponding author: Xiaojun Yang, yxj5460@163.com
  • Received Date: 2020-07-12
    Accepted Date: 2020-09-26
  • In order to solve the problem of poor thermal insulation in the current wood-plastic building, two kinds of structural wood wall integrated with wood plastic composite (WPC) are designed, and the thermal insulation performances of the walls are studied. The results show that the WPC integrated wall with frame-shear structure has a good stability, and the excellent performance of the WPC can be fully realized. Wall studs and wall panels are important factors affecting the thermal performance of the walls. Wood plastic materials can meet the thermal performance requirements of the walls. The single-layer frame walls and double-layer frame walls integrated with the WPC both have a good thermal performance. According to 'Design Standard for Energy Efficiency of Public Buildings (GB 50189-2015)', the heat transfer coefficient of the single-layer frame wall integrated with 20 mm thick WPC wall boards and WPC wall studs is 0.414 W/(m2·K), which can meet the standard of wall thermal level Ⅱt and is suitable for cold areas. The heat transfer coefficient of the double-layer frame wall integrated with 50 mm thick WPC wall panel and WPC wall studs is 0.207 W/(m2·K), which can meet the standard of wall thermal level Ⅰt and is suitable for severe cold areas.
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    Ashori, A. , 2008. Wood-plastic composites as promising green-composites for automotive industries. Bioresour. Technol. 99, 4661-4667. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.09.043
    [2]

    Ashrafi, M. , Vaziri, A. , Nayeb-Hashemi, H. , 2011. Effect of processing variables and fiber reinforcement on the mechanical properties of wood plastic composites. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 30, 1939-1945. doi: 10.1177/0731684411431120
    [3]

    Bhaskar, J. , Haq, S. , Yadaw, S. B. , 2012. Evaluation and testing of mechanical properties of wood plastic composite. J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater. 25, 391-401. doi: 10.1177/0892705711406158
    [4]

    Brandner, R. , Flatscher, G. , Ringhofer, A. , Schickhofer, G. , Thiel, A. , 2016. Cross laminated timber (CLT): overview and development. Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod. 74, 331-351. doi: 10.1007/s00107-015-0999-5
    [5]

    Butylina, S. , Martikka, O. , Kärki, T. , 2011. Physical and mechanical properties of wood-polypropylene compos/ites made with virgin and/or recycled polypropylene. Polym. -Plast. Technol. Eng. 50, 1040-1046. doi: 10.1080/03602559.2011.557823
    [6]

    Gardner, D. J. , Han, Y. , Wang, L. , 2015. Wood: plastic composite technology. Curr. For. Rep. 1, 139-150.
    [7]

    Herrera, J. P. , Bedoya-Ruiz, D. , Hurtado, J. E. , 2018. Seismic behavior of recycled plastic lumber walls: an experimental and analytical research. Eng. Struct. 177, 566-578. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.10.006
    [8]

    Keskisaari, A. , Kärki, T. , 2018. The use of waste materials in wood-plastic composites and their impact on the profitability of the product. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 134, 257-261. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.03.023
    [9]

    Li, Y. L. , Li, Y. Q. , Shen, Z. Y. , 2016. Investigation on flexural strength of cold-formed thin-walled steel beams with built-up box section. Thin-Walled Struct. 107, 66-79. doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2016.05.026
    [10]

    Liu, B. , Liu, J. Z. , Liu, T. , Li, Y. , Ye, N. B. , Wang, Q. W. , 2019. Effect of additives with different electromagnetic spectrum responses on weather resistance of PVC wood plastic products. Synth. Mater. Aging Appl. 48, 10-14.
    [11]

    Lu, Y. , Zhou, T. H. , Li, W. C. , Wu, H. H. , 2017. Experimental investigation and a novel direct strength method for cold-formed built-up I-section columns. Thin - Walled Struct. 112, 125-139. doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2016.12.011
    [12]

    Machado, J. S. , Santos, S. , Pinho, F. F. S. , Luís, F. , Alves, A. , Simões, R. , Rodrigues, J. C. , 2016. Impact of high moisture conditions on the serviceability performance of wood plastic composite decks. Mater. Des. 103, 122-131. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.04.030
    [13]

    Misawa, F., Hirota, K., 2008. An education program "Building Pathology for Timber Architecture". In: 10th World Conference on Timber Engineering, 1, pp. 512–519.
    [14]

    Petchwattana, N. , Covavisaruch, S. , 2014. Mechanical and morphological properties of wood plastic biocomposites prepared from toughened poly(lactic acid) and rubber wood sawdust (Hevea brasiliensis). J. Bionic Eng. 11, 630-637. doi: 10.1016/S1672-6529(14)60074-3
    [15]

    Puettmann, M. E. , Wilson, J. B. , 2005. Life-cycle analysis of wood products: cradle-to-gate LCI of residential wood building materials. Wood Fiber Sci. 37, 18-29.
    [16]

    Ramage, M. H. , Burridge, H. , Busse-Wicher, M. , Fereday, G. , Reynolds, T. , Shah, D. U. , Wu, G. L. , Yu, L. , Fleming, P. , Densley-Tingley, D. , Allwood, J. , Dupree, P. , Linden, P. F. , Scherman, O. , 2017. The wood from the trees: the use of timber in construction. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 68, 333-359. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.107
    [17]

    Segerholm, B. K. , Ibach, R. E. , Westin, M. , 2012. Moisture sorption, biological durability, and mechanical performance of WPC containing modified wood and polylactates. BioResources 7, 4575-4585.
    [18]

    Smith, I., Snow, M., Asiz, A., 2008. Failure Analysis of Engineering Wood Products. Fracture of Nano and Engineering Materials and Structures. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 1193–1194.
    [19]

    Takino, A. , Shimokawa, C. , Ishiyama, H. , Nakano, R. , 2018. Experimental study on lateral performance of shear wall of modern timber architecture combined with brace and plaster using wood lath. J. Struct. Constr. Eng. Trans. AIJ 83, 1477-1485. doi: 10.3130/aijs.83.1477
    [20]

    Yang, X. , Ma, L. , Zhao, Q. , Yu, Y. , 2018. Enduring performance of self-tapping screw connection in wood members and WPC members. Wood Res. 63, 833-842.
    [21]

    Yang, X. J. , Tang, X. L. , Ma, L. , Sun, Y. F. , 2019. Sound insulation performance of structural wood wall integrated with wood plastic composite. J. Bioresour. Bioprod. 4, 111-118.
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Figures(14) / Tables(3)

Article Metrics

Article views(48) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()

Related
Proportional views

Wood Plastic Composites Based Wood Wall's Structure and Thermal Insulation Performance

    Corresponding author: Xiaojun Yang, yxj5460@163.com
  • College of Material Science and Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China

Abstract: In order to solve the problem of poor thermal insulation in the current wood-plastic building, two kinds of structural wood wall integrated with wood plastic composite (WPC) are designed, and the thermal insulation performances of the walls are studied. The results show that the WPC integrated wall with frame-shear structure has a good stability, and the excellent performance of the WPC can be fully realized. Wall studs and wall panels are important factors affecting the thermal performance of the walls. Wood plastic materials can meet the thermal performance requirements of the walls. The single-layer frame walls and double-layer frame walls integrated with the WPC both have a good thermal performance. According to 'Design Standard for Energy Efficiency of Public Buildings (GB 50189-2015)', the heat transfer coefficient of the single-layer frame wall integrated with 20 mm thick WPC wall boards and WPC wall studs is 0.414 W/(m2·K), which can meet the standard of wall thermal level Ⅱt and is suitable for cold areas. The heat transfer coefficient of the double-layer frame wall integrated with 50 mm thick WPC wall panel and WPC wall studs is 0.207 W/(m2·K), which can meet the standard of wall thermal level Ⅰt and is suitable for severe cold areas.

1.   Introduction
  • Over the past few years, wood structures have been recognized and promoted by all sectors of society for their features of saving materials, large span, reasonable structure, good durability, fast construction speed and convenient construction (Brandner et al., 2016; Ramage et al., 2017). Not only that, but also can be combined with other structures and materials to form a composite building structure system, making comprehensive use of the characteristics of various building materials achieve the effect of architectural design and structural optimization (Puettmann and Wilson, 2005; Misawa and Hirota, 2008). In addition, engineered wood products (e.g., glued wood and wood-plastic composites) are superior to natural wood in terms of structural and material properties and can be used instead of precious natural wood in the structural and wall construction systems of buildings, solving the problems of structural timber, and saving natural resources and building energy (Smith et al., 2008; Takino et al., 2018; Yang et al., 2018).

    Wood-plastic composite (WPC) material is a thermoplastic engineering wood product, made of wood fibers (or plant fibers) and polymer plastic through a specific process, with excellent anti-corrosion properties, waterproof properties, thermal insulation properties and easy processing properties, etc. (Ashori, 2008), and is widely used in building interior decoration or garden architecture products. In the past, WPC has common deficiencies such as easy aging, low mechanical strength, poor toughness and poor flowability in the process of compounding (Ashrafi et al., 2011; Butylina et al., 2011; Machado et al., 2016). In order to improve its performance, many scholars have conducted researches on it. In 2014, Petchwattana and Covavisaruch (2014) studied the mechanical and morphological properties of wood plastic bio composites prepared from toughened poly and rubber wood sawdust. By using the acrylic Core-Shell Rubber (CSR) particles as toughening agent, both the impact strength and the tensile elongation at break can be improved. In 2019, Liu et al. (2019) found out a formulation of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) wood-plastic composites with excellent weather resistance, thus improving the aging resistance of outdoor WPC products.

    With the advancement of the WPC production technology, the quality of the WPC products continues to improve, and shortcomings in production and use have now been radically addressed. If the WPC products continue to be applied as outdoor engineering materials or decorative materials, the value of both the application and the profiting crowd will be limited. Therefore, the use of high-quality WPC in wood structures to fully exploit its outstanding performance and better serve society has become an important issue for the WPC industry. Fig. 1 shows a typical WPC building. The WPC is used as a kind of material for exterior wall panels. To expand its usage, many scholars have explored the design and construction of lightweight steel WPC structures, and the WPC has shown excellent performance (Li et al., 2016; Lu et al., 2017). However, there are still some obvious problems such as poor building thermal performance, long construction cycle and poor living experience, etc. (Bhaskar et al., 2012; Segerholm et al., 2012).

    Figure 1.  A building with wood-plastic composite (WPC) exterior wall panel.

    Compared with lightweight steel WPC structures, wood structures show significant performance advantages. Exploring a wood structure with the WPC as the main material is an important way to overcome the deficiencies of existing lightweight steel WPC buildings. Walls occupy a large proportion in the building, which is the key to building performance, architectural design and construction. The thermal insulation performance of the wall is an important indicator for evaluating the thermal engineering performance of the building envelope, and the heat consumption of the envelope in residential buildings accounts for more than 70% of the total building heat consumption (Keskisaari and Kärki, 2018).

    Therefore, this paper investigates the thermal insulation performance of WPC integrated walls by designing wood structure walls based on wood-frame design methods, starting from the wall structure material and wall paneling form, with a view to finding walls suitable for WPC buildings, which is of great significance for the development of WPC buildings.

2.   Materials and Methods
  • The timber used for the test is pine (Pinus banksiana) from Canada, with straight grain and some knots, an average moisture content of about 13%, and an end face dimension of 38 mm × 89 mm. The glulam is made of Spruce-Pine-Fir (SPF) from Canada, with an average moisture content of about 13% and an end face dimension of 120 mm × 120 mm. The detailed dimensions are shown in Figs. 2-5.

    Figure 2.  Wall (G1) structure assembled with light steel studs.

    Figure 3.  Wall (S2) structure assembled with pine studs.

    Figure 4.  Wall (W4) structure assembled with WPC studs.

    Figure 5.  Double-layer frame wall (W5) structure assembled with WPC studs.

    The test walls are consisted of frames and wall panels. Studs of the WPC, pine, glulam and lightweight steel are used to assemble the frames. Wall panels include exterior wall hanging plates and interior panels.

    The WPC studs are made of hollow structural polyethylene (PE) WPC. The dimension of end face is 40 mm × 90 mm and the wall thickness of the WPC studs is 7 mm.

    The exterior wall hanging plates are made of PE co-extruded wood plastic. There are two kinds of exterior wall panels. One is rib profiles with end face dimensions of 20 mm × 200 mm, the other is hollow sheets with end face dimensions of 50 mm × 200 mm, and both of them have wall thickness of 7mm. The interior panel is made of PVC WPC with 1220 mm × 2440 mm exterior dimensions, 8 mm wall thickness and 930 kg/m3 density. The WPCPE means PE co-extruded wood plastic, and WPCPVC means PVC co-extruded wood plastic. Fig. 6 shows the test materials of wall stud and wall panels.

    Figure 6.  Test materials of WPC.

    The snap-fit PVC plastic exterior wall hanging plates have a dimension of 230 mm × 4000 mm and a wall thickness of 1.5 mm. The lightweight steel for the walls is cold-formed thin-walled C steel, with a cross-sectional height of 73 mm, a cross-sectional width of 33 mm, a seam width of 26 mm and a thickness of 1 mm. The glass fiber cotton filled between the studs is composite aluminum foil glass wool, with a thickness of 50 mm, a dry density of 11 kg/m3, and a fire resistance grade of A non-combustible. The specification of fireproof paper plasterboard for wall cladding is 1220 mm × 2440 mm × 9.5 mm, the surface density is 9.5 kg/m2, and the fire resistance grade is A non-combustible, environmental protection grade E0 (formaldehyde emission ≤ 0.5 mg/L) (GB 8624-2912: Classification for Burning Behavior of Building Materials and Products). Breathing paper for waterproof and moisture proof, the appearance was layered and concave, a thickness of 0.5 mm, and a fracture elongation of 88%. Waterproof and moisture-proof respiratory paper has a laminar concave and convex appearance, the thickness is 0.5 mm, the elongation at break is 88%, and the impermeability is 2 m water column 24 h impermeability.

    Figs. 25 show the typical structure of the wall. Referring to GB 50005-2017 (Standard for Design of Timber Structures) and GB 50361-2018 (Technical Standard for Infills or Partitions with Timber Framework), the test wall was constructed in the form of a frame shear structure, i.e., framed in glued laminated timber and shear-resistant by nailing oriented structural particle board (OSB) to the frame and to the studs in the frame, with nail spacing of 150 mm.

    The test walls are divided into single-layer frame walls and double-layer frame walls. The single-layer frame wall means that the outer surface of the wall using a hanging board carried by the wall, and the double-layer frame wall refers to a kind of wall which arranges a protective wall on the outside of the frame shear wall carried by the foundation and supported by frame shear wall. The wall studs are of lightweight steel, WPCPE and pine.

    The inner wall cladding is covered with 9.5 mm thick fireproof paper plasterboard and the outer wall panels are fixed to the outside of the framed walls by hanging plates, in the form of 20 mm thick WPCPE, 50 mm thick WPCPE and PVC hanging plate. The wall frame cavity is filled with glass fiber cotton. Fig. 7 shows the structure details of wall (W4).

    Figure 7.  Wall (W4) structure details.

    Designs of 11 groups of wall samples are shown in Table 1. In order to evaluate the influence of the wall studs on the insulation performance of wall, lightweight steel, WPCPE, pines are respectively adopted as the wall studs. The external wall hanging plate was suspended from the outside of the wall to achieve the functions of insulation, decoration, and protection. The structural form, material and sealing performance of the external wall hanging panel will affect the heat insulation capacity. In order to evaluate the influence of the external wall hanging plate on the wall insulation performance, 15 mm thick PVC board, 20 mm thick WPCPE board, and 50 mm thick WPCPE board are used as the external wall hanging plates. The walls were assembled and tested in the laboratory of Nanjing Forestry University.

    Set code Wall stud type Interior wall panel Exterior wall panel Remarks
    G1 Light steel WPCPVC - Single-layer wall
    S1 Pine - - Single-layer wall
    S2 Pine WPCPVC - Single-layer wall
    S3 Pine WPCPVC WPCPVC Single-layer wall
    S4 Pine WPCPVC WPCPE with thickness of 20 mm Single-layer wall
    S5 Pine WPCPVC WPCPE with thickness of 50 mm Double-layer wall
    W1 WPCPE - - Single-layer wall
    W2 WPCPE WPCPVC - Single-layer wall
    W3 WPCPE WPCPVC WPCPVC Single-layer wall
    W4 WPCPE WPCPVC WPCPE with thickness of 20 mm Single-layer wall
    W5 WPCPE WPCPVC WPCPE with thickness of 50 mm Double-layer wall
    Notes: "-" in the table indicates that there is no such item. WPCPVC, polyvinyl chloride co-extruded wood plastic; WPCPE, polyethylene co-extruded wood plastic.

    Table 1.  Structural wood wall samples integrated with WPC.

  • According to GB/T 13475-2008 (Thermal Insulation—Determination of Steady-state Thermal Transmission Properties—Calibrated and Guard Hot Box), the thermal insulation performance of walls was tested by the guard hot box method. The test walls were made according to the design and had the dimension of 1100 mm × 910 mm.

    Fig. 8 shows the layout of measuring points for wall's insulation test. Eighteen temperature sensors were equally interval fixed at the specified position on both side and outside surfaces of the wall by tin foil. One measuring point was fixed in the middle of the wall filled with glass fiber cotton, and 8 measuring points were evenly fixed in the thermal bridge part where the surrounding studs were located. The spacing between measuring points was 300 mm. The air temperature measuring point was arranged in a suspended position between the wall and the cold-hot box. The heat flux plates were located in the center and sides of the wall. The temperature of the hot box was set to 50 ℃ and the time interval of measuring point temperature for 30 min. After reaching the steady state, the cold surface air temperature, the temperature of each measuring point on the cold surface, the hot air temperature, the temperature of each measuring point of the hot surface and the heat flux value at each interval were recorded. The heat transfer coefficient value of each wall was calculated according to GB/T 23483-2009 (Test Standard for Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient of Building Envelope and Heat Supply for Space Heating).

    Figure 8.  Layout of measuring points for wall's insulation test (left: cold side of wall; right: hot side of wall).

3.   Results and Discussion
  • Fig. 9 shows heat insulation test of materials. In the test, 11 groups of walls show the same regularity. Take W5 wall with 50 mm thickness of WPC exterior wall panel as an example. Fig. 10 shows the test temperature of W5 wall at each point. The indoor environmental temperature (thermostat temperature of the hot box) rised first, then fell, and tended to be stable after 6 h.

    Figure 9.  Heat insulation test.

    Figure 10.  Temperature curve of each position of W5 wall.

    After the temperature-controlled hot box was heated, the temperature rised, when the threshold value was exceeded, the heating stopped, and the temperature slowly dropped to the set temperature. The heating system was automatically controlled by the system, and the hot box was always in a dynamic environment with dynamic balance. After reaching steady state, the temperature of the measuring point between the position of the wall studs on the external surface of wall was generally higher than the temperature of the measuring point of the position of the glass fiber cotton. The wall studs were the main part of heat conduction. There was a certain thermal bridge effect leading to the increase of heat flow, heat consumption and temperature. Fig. 11 shows that heat flux value tends to be steady after 12 h. Due to the different materials used in the construction of different parts of the wall, the heat flux value was different. The heat flux value at the wall studs was generally higher than the that at the glass fiber cotton. After reaching steady state, the heat flux fluctuated in the range of 5-10 W/m2. The WPC wall was a frame-shear structure composed of multi-layer materials, in which the WPC wall studs were arranged at a certain interval. The heat transfer rates of the wall studs and the cavity portion were different. The wall studs reduced the thermal resistance of the wall and then promoted heat conduction.

    Figure 11.  Heat flux curve of W5 wall at different locations.

    In the figure, q1 and q2 indicate heat flux of the position of wall studs and insulation cotton, respectively.

    Fig. 12 shows the heat transfer coefficient of different locations of W5 wall. The calculation of heat transfer coefficient of different parts of the wall should be based on the requirements of JGJ/T 132-2009 (Standard for Energy Efficiency Test of Residential Buildings). The final calculated value of the thermal resistance of the main part of the retaining structure was not more than 5% compared with the calculated value before 24 h. According to the average heat transfer coefficient of 0.237 W/(m2·K) and 0.188 W/(m2·K) after 12 h in the location of studs and in the location of insulation cotton, the heat transfer coefficient at the studs was 20.7% higher than that at the insulation cotton on average.

    Figure 12.  Heat transfer coefficient of W5 wall at different locations.

    In the figure, K1 and K2 indicate heat transfer coefficient of the position of wall studs and insulation cotton, respectively.

    Considering the obvious influence of thermal bridge effect in the location of studs, the total heat transfer coefficient of the wall must take the influence of heat transfer in the location of the studs into account. The total heat transfer coefficient of the walls can be calculated by the area-weighted method (Equation (1)):

    where U is the total heat transfer coefficient of the test wall (W/(m2·K)); Si is the proportion of the location of insulation cotton (glass fiber cotton) area to the wall area, which is calculated to be 53%; Ki is the heat transfer coefficient in the location of insulation cotton (glass fiber cotton) (W/(m2·K)); Sf is the proportion of the location of WPC wall studs area to the wall area, which is calculated to be 47%; and Kf is the heat transfer coefficient in the location of WPC wall studs (W/(m2·K)).

    The total heat transfer coefficients of each groups of walls calculated according to Equation (1) are shown in Table 2. According to GB50189-2015 (Design Standard for Energy Efficiency of Public Buildings), the effective heat transfer coefficients U of G1, S1 and W1 < 0.6 W/(m2·K), which meet the standard of wall thermal level Ⅲt and is suitable for cold regions or hot summer and cold winter regions. The S2, S4, W2, W4 effective heat transfer coefficients U < 0.5 W/(m2·K), meet the standard of wall thermal level Ⅱt, and is suitable for cold regions. The S3, S5, W3, W5 effective heat transfer coefficients U < 0.4 W/(m2·K), which meet the standard of wall thermal level Ⅰt and can be applied to severe cold regions. The walls with the WPC as the wall studs are made of the WPC exterior wall hanging panels with thickness of 50 mm, which have the lowest total heat transfer coefficient and the best thermal insulation performance.

    Set code Heat transfer coefficient in location of wall studs Heat transfer coefficient in location of insulation cotton Total heat transfer coefficient
    G1 0.583 0.510 0.544
    S1 0.580 0.530 0.553
    S2 0.503 0.434 0.466
    S3 0.399 0.365 0.381
    S4 0.439 0.382 0.408
    S5 0.403 0.354 0.377
    W1 0.587 0.466 0.523
    W2 0.484 0.386 0.432
    W3 0.338 0.258 0.295
    W4 0.481 0.354 0.414
    W5 0.237 0.188 0.207

    Table 2.  Measured heat transfer coefficient of structural wood wall integrated with WPC (W/(m2·K)).

  • The thermal conductivity of the WPC and OSB was measured by thermal characteristic analyzer (Model: ISOMET 2104). The thermal parameters of other materials were obtained according to GB50176-2016 (Code for Thermal Design of Civil Building). Table 3 shows the parameters of wall materials. The thermal conductivity of lightweight steel was the highest, and the relationship between thermal conductivity of materials was as follows: light steel > WPCPE > PVC > WPCPVC > pine. The higher thermal conductivity, the worse the thermal performance. As a result, the thermal performance of pine was better than WPCPVC, WPCPVC was better than PVC, PVC was better than WPCPE, and the thermal performance of WPCPE was better than light steel. In addition, the thermal conductivity of the WPCPE panel is close to that of common building wall covering panel (such as paper-based fireproof gypsum board, OSB, etc.). In terms of thermal performance, the WPCPVC and PVC were close to the requirements of thermal insulation material (thermal conductivity < 0.14 W/(m·K)). Compared with light steel materials, the WPCPE has a great thermal insulation advantage. It can be found that using WPC materials as building external wall panels, interior wall panels and wall studs has obvious advantages in building thermal performance.

    Material Density (kg/m3) Thermal conductivity (W/(m·K))
    Light steel 7830 58.200
    PVC 1310 0.170
    Pine 430 0.137
    WPCPVC 730 0.156
    WPCPE 1310 0.338
    Paper fireproof gypsum 9070 0.330
    OSB 650 0.340
    Glass fiber cotton 70 0.035
    Notes: PVC, polyvinyl chloride; OSB, oriented structural particle board.

    Table 3.  Thermal parameters of wall materials.

  • Fig. 13 shows that the G1 wall had the highest heat transfer coefficient while W2 wall had the lowest. The heat transfer coefficient of the S2 wall was 0.078 W/(m2·K) lower than that of the G1 wall with a drop of 14.3%. The insulation performance of the walls using the pine as the wall studs was better than that of the wall with wall studs made of lightweight steel. Lightweight steel was a good thermal conductor, which was not conducive to heat insulation. The obvious thermal bridge effect in the wall was an important reason for the poor thermal insulation of WPC buildings based lightweight steel structures. The heat transfer coefficient of the W2 wall was 0.034 W/(m2·K) lower than that of the S2 wall, and the drop was 7.3%. The insulation performance of the wall with the WPC material as the wall studs was better than that of pine.

    Figure 13.  Heat transfer coefficient of walls assembled with different wall studs.

    Although the thermal conductivity of the WPC was higher than that of pine, the hollow structure of the pine studs and the addition of an air layer with good thermal insulation to the wood-plastic material resulted in better thermal performance than that of the pine for the wall studs, and the total heat transfer coefficient of the wall was further reduced.

  • Fig. 14 shows that the total heat transfer coefficient of the wall with the WPC materials as the wall studs were W5 < W3 < W4 < W2 < W1. The W5 had the lowest heat transfer coefficient and the highest heat transfer resistance. The W5 with 50 mm thick WPC external wall panels had the best thermal performance, which was determined by the hollow section structure of external wall panels and the excellent thermal performance of WPC materials. The W3 < W4 indicated that the thermal performance of the wall using PVC panels was better than that of WPCPE exterior wall panels with thickness of 20 mm. The thermal conductivity of the PVC was lower than that of WPCPE, and the thermal insulation performance of PVC was better. Due to the thin thickness of the PVC panels, the WPC exterior wall panels could obtain better thermal performance by increasing the thickness and adopting the hollow structure. The reason for W2 < W1 was the setting of the inner wall panel, which increased the structural thickness, and WPCPVC was an excellent thermal insulation material. As an interior wall facing slab, WPCPVC played a role in internal decoration while also providing good thermal insulation. The heat transfer coefficient of exterior WPC panels of the W4 wall with thickness of 20 mm and the exterior WPC panels of W5 wall with thickness of 50 mm were reduced by 20.8% and 60.4% respectively compared with the W1 wall without the external wall panel. The wall using pine as the wall studs also reflected the same thermal performance rule: S5 < S3 < S4 < S2 < S1. The heat transfer coefficients of the WPC integrated wall with internal wall panels, external wall panels with thickness of 20 mm and 50 mm were 26.2% and 31.8% lower than those without the internal wall panels and external wall panels, respectively. Reasonable setting the wall panels material and wall structure is an important measure to improve the thermal performance of the wall.

    Figure 14.  Heat transfer coefficient of walls assembled with different wall panels.

    The earliest WPC appeared nearly a century ago where wood flour was combined with phenol-formaldehyde resin to create a composite material used as an automobile gearshift knob (Gardner et al., 2015). At present, the WPC is a kind of high-performance composite material, characterized for its excellent mechanical properties, insulation performance, and decorative performance. The frame-shear structure wall in the building has a good seismic performance and flexible space layout. In the past few decades, there have been fewer researchers studying wood-plastic frame-shear walls. The study of the WPC wall is still an area to be developed. Some researchers have studied the seismic performance of recycled plastic wood wall. The results showed that the recycled plastic wood wall had good seismic performance under cyclic loading (Yang et al., 2019). In addition, relevant researchers studied the sound insulation performance of the WPC wall, and the wall stud and the exterior wall panel material of the WPC wall had a significant influence on the sound insulation effect of the wall (Herrera et al., 2018). However, there has been little research on the thermal insulation properties of the WPC walls. The frame-shear wall has a good resistance to horizontal loads. This study is focused on the thermal insulation properties of the WPC frame-shear walls, exploring the factors affecting the integration of the WPC wall and promoting the development of the WPC buildings.

4.   Conclusions
  • The building structure of frame shear wall with glulam as the frame and WPC as the wall studs, exterior wall panels and interior panels can overcome the shortcomings of low thermal resistance and damping ratio in lightweight steel structure. The thermal conductivity of the wall studs is an important factor affecting the thermal performance of the wall. The WPC material is a hollow structure with good thermal insulation, which enables the wall to obtain better thermal performance. The heat transfer coefficient of the single-layer frame wall integrated with the WPC wall panels with thickness of 20 mm and WPC wall studs is 0.414 W/(m2·K), which can meet the standard of wall thermal level Ⅱt and is suitable for cold areas. The heat transfer coefficient of the double-layer frame wall integrated with WPC wall panels with thickness of 50 mm and WPC wall studs is 0.207 W/(m2·K), which can meet the standard of wall thermal level Ⅰt and is suitable for severe cold areas.

Declaration of Competing Interest
  • There are no conflicts to declare.

Reference (21)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return